I Was Framed by Dr. John Velyvis and His Brother Dr. Peter Velyvis (2018) Concerning My Communication With the Immediate Velyvis Family.

Christine:Melissanne Email ThreadChristine Velyvis A

I am disappointed and ashamed of Dr. Peter Velyvis, John’s brother. He is an endodontist on the East Coast and is a decade younger than John. He blatently lied to protect John concerning communications between myself, and his wife Christine Velyvis from a period of summer 2017 to January 2018. His lies were used as EXHIBITS during our divorce in CA. They put me in a false light.

The fraudulent EXHIBITS consisted of emails between Christine Velyvis and myself, then forwarded to Peter Velyvis. It is not clear whether Christine Velyvis forwarded them to Peter, or if he forwarded them from his wife’s email to himself. Either way, the emails were then forwarded to Dr. John Velyvis’s underhanded divorce lawyer. In the emails to John’s lawyer, Dr. Peter Velyvis simply cuts and pastes fragments of the emails between myself and his wife. He made it “appear” that I had been communicating with him as well which is a lie. I have NEVER been in contact with him.

I contacted Christine Velyvis about her husband forwarding the emails to John’s attorney. She stated it was the first she had heard of it. She reminded me that John had threatened Peter with legal action should he fail to turn over any emails I had sent to them during our separation. Regardless, the fact that the emails were altered is wrongful.

In court, John stated his “family” had to block me because of the emails and calls. That is not true.

  1. There were not many emails, and Christine responded to them. There was never an issue;
  2. I only called her two or three times in a 9 month period. I left voice messages. She emailed me back. The blocking issue was a fabrication.
  3. Bottom line is that it isn’t against the law to communicate about separation with in-laws. I was very much silent with all but my sister-in-law, Christine Velyvis.

During our marriage, I was tight lipped with John’s siblings due to abuse. I had a “somewhat” relationship with my mother-in-law. John was estranged from his brother, Dr. Peter Velyvis. John told me he didn’t get along with Peter’s wife, Christine Velyvis. Regardless, Christine and I were both married to the brothers. She and I were Facebook friends, but didn’t communicate very much. They live on the East Coast and we on the West Coast.

Even though Christine and I were only related by marriage to the Velyvis brothers, we did communicate during my separation period. I never reached out to my mother-in-law, Claire Velyvis, my sister-in-law, Kristin Velyvis, or my brother-in-law, Dr. Peter Velyvis.

Dr. John Velyvis has two siblings, Dr. Peter Velyvis and Kristin Velyvis. His mother, Claire Velyvis is alive, and his father G. John Velyvis passed in 2014. After I separated from John, I did not communicate with any of them. This is important to note as Dr. John Velyvis has lied to others concerning me contacting his mother, brother and sister. I assure none of them would ever be able to substantiate the claim as I never did. The only family member I was in contact with was Christine Velyivs, who is Dr. Peter Velyvis’s wife. Again, we were both married to a Velyvis brother. The brothers were estranged.

John Velyvis threatened his brother with legal action, and little brother complied. Brother’s that both were and are covering up domestic violence. Two men with medical degrees. Pillars of our society? They should be held to a higher standard.

I have provided a link to the email correspondence between Christine and myself. Peter Velyvis simply sent my emails with no correspondence from his wife, and stated my emails were “unsolicitated. ”

I would like to give some background to  the December 2017 email I wrote. I received a “scant” portion of Divorce Discovery from John on or about December 21, 2017. As I was reviewing partial Bank Statements from him, I was taken aback by the way the credit card told the story of John’s courtship to this Kaitlyn Rebecca Dickens “AKA” Kaitlyn Woods. I believe John deliberatley charged the items for me to see them during the divorce process. This is the first moment I found out he was with this girl. The same girl he was exchanging emails with during our marriage.

The timeline: vacations, new Mercedes purchase, wedding ring, limo, tux rental, wedding attire, the Fairmont Hotel stay in San Francisco, and a florist. It was most obvious that this was a “recreaction” of our wedding at the Fairmont Hotel in San Francisco. Also, charges for false eyelash extensions, weaves, nails, pedicure, and such.

The whole thing was baffling. I felt I was reading the wrong bank statement. Thinking he must have sent our wedding. However, I never had eyelash extensions and weaves. I then saw the actual name Kaitlyn Dickens on the credit card for an airline ticket. I was taken aback at this “Mock Wedding. ” John and I were not divorced. I also just got out of a spinal sugery procedure. I reached out to my sister-in-law, Christine Velyvis.

I am of the opinion that they are binding together to keep up appearances. Two doctors, that are brothers. One Harvard and one Tufts. Prestige is more important than what is right with this family. Not the whole family but the immediate family.




Christine Velyvis A

Author: Melissanne

My name is Melissanne Velyvis. I am the mother of two successful adult children, and one adorable grand-child. I am a survivor of physical, emotional, and economic abuse. Due to the judicial misconduct of the Hon. Beverly Wood of Marin County, CA, I am not properly protected. I believe my story is of public concern. I would like to educate the public about Non-fatal Strangulation. I can be reached at melissanne@melissanne-velyvis.blog

2 thoughts on “I Was Framed by Dr. John Velyvis and His Brother Dr. Peter Velyvis (2018) Concerning My Communication With the Immediate Velyvis Family.”

  1. This is some bullshit. Just because you only sent a few emails and made a few calls doesn’t mean that there’s no problem. You, in this blog, said that John Velyvis said that there was a problem, while you also said that you were emailing with Christine. Those two points were in no way connected, but you tried to make them so. Maybe think about what you’re writing before you publish.


    1. Where did I state that John Velyvis said there was a problem? It appears you attempt to paraphrase, but I find it obsure. You might want to rephrase to clarify your point.

      Thank you


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: